Get your cybersecurity submission approved...
the first time.

100% FDA approval rate guaranteed: our platform finds the gaps in your cybersecurity submission and our former FDA reviewers check it before you file.

Free to start · no sales call required

Submission package

Cleared for FDA review

Every section, evidence-backed

Regulatory Audit
eSTAR Readiness
Threat Modeling
Doc Generation

Reviewed by former FDA reviewers before you file.

medical device manufacturers
leading global MDMs
projects delivered
cybersecurity documentation approval rate

From first assessment to filed submission

Watch readiness become evidence, and evidence become approval.

Score your maturity in about thirty minutes, see which eSTAR sections still owe evidence, get reviewer-style findings cited to the requirement, and close them before you file.

01 · Assess

Start with a maturity assessment.

About thirty minutes per device, graded across the five practice areas FDA evaluates. You get a level out of five for each, so a weakness has a name and a number before anyone has to defend it.

Maturity Assessment

Maturity Assessment

~30 min per device

Overall maturity

Secure design & architecture3.8
Supply chain & SBOM4.2
Verification & testing3.1
Vulnerability handling2.4
Postmarket monitoring1.6

02 · Benchmark

Check readiness by eSTAR section.

Your package is scored against the structure the FDA will actually review it in. Each category comes back fulfilled, partial, or not fulfilled, so you can see which sections are ready to file and which still owe evidence.

FDA eSTAR Readiness

FDA eSTAR Readiness

8 of 12 categories addressed

67%

submission-ready

FDA eSTAR CategoryStatus
Security Risk Management ReportPartial
Threat Model DocumentationFulfilled
Cybersecurity Risk AssessmentPartial
Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)Not fulfilled
Vulnerabilities with Uncontrolled RiskPartial

03 · Audit

Run the review before the reviewer does.

Regulatory Audit reads your threat model, risk assessment, and SBOM as one body of evidence and returns reviewer-style findings, each ranked Critical, Major, or Minor with the requirement it cites attached.

Regulatory Audit

Regulatory Audit

Ranked by severity, cited to requirement

15

findings by severity

Critical2
Major5
Minor8
Threat model traceability incompleteThreat Modeling
Postmarket plan lacks traceable evidenceCybersecurity Management Plan
SBOM missing supplier fieldsSoftware Bill of Materials
Checking against FDA premarket requirements

04 · Resolve

Turn gaps into a prioritized workstream.

Every finding stays open until it is closed or dismissed with a reason, so a package that has been worked through can be told apart from one that has only been scanned. Former FDA reviewers help triage what is worth your time.

Remediation

Prioritized workstream

Open until closed or dismissed with a reason

The critical two, first.

Findings carry an owner, the evidence they need, and reviewer context in the same workflow.

CriticalThreat model traceability
MajorPostmarket response plan
MajorSBOM supplier fields
MinorSecurity testing summary

05 · Prove

Finish submission-ready and secure.

When the evidence is complete and mapped, the same platform view becomes a defensible record of cybersecurity compliance, and the annual re-run Section 524B requires is a re-scan rather than a rebuild.

Submission

Readiness outcome

Submission ready.

Evidence mapped

Every finding traced to its requirement

Gaps closed

Or dismissed on the record, with a reason

Section 524B

The annual re-run is a re-scan, not a rebuild

Start where the regulatory pressure is highest.

Close the evidence gap quickly.

Bring former FDA reviewer context to the response, connect each concern to supporting evidence, and keep the remediation path visible to the whole team.

Review your situation

What you leave with

  • A response that answers every deficiency, so the letter does not come back a second time
  • Weeks off the clock your launch date is currently losing
  • A former FDA reviewer's read on the response before it goes back

The framework changed. Your evidence has to keep up.

Read the analysis

QMSR in practice

Lessons from the first wave of FDA inspections under the new quality framework.

The EU CRA countdown

Mandatory vulnerability reporting begins September 11, 2026.

AI vs. AI

Regulators now use AI to catch inconsistencies in submissions.

Know where you are in 1 hour.

Run the free check or talk to a human. Either way, you’ll get a clearer view of readiness without a paywall or lengthy sales call.

Check readiness