Case study · Plan & Benchmark Product Security
Helm Competitive Analysis: Outperforming Grype, Dependency Track, and Blackduck
How Helm achieves 96% accuracy while eliminating false positives that waste security teams' time
Read case studyExecutive summary
What this whitepaper covers
As healthcare systems grow increasingly connected, the risk of medical device vulnerabilities expands with it. This joint whitepaper by Medcrypt and The AbedGraham Group provides a clinically informed, patient safety-driven approach to evaluating and prioritizing vulnerabilities in connected medical devices. Using real-world use cases and quantitative analytics, it demonstrates how technical flaws like Ripple20 and BlueKeep translate into tangible clinical, operational, financial, and regulatory risks; and offers a framework for mitigation that aligns with both cybersecurity and patient safety objectives.
Why it matters
The regulatory and product context
Traditional vulnerability scoring systems (e.g., CVSS) don’t capture the real-world clinical impact of a cyber event. A vulnerability that seems minor on paper could disrupt patient care, while others may be less impactful than headlines suggest. This paper reframes vulnerability management through a patient safety lens, helping both manufacturers and healthcare delivery organizations prioritize threats based on how they affect clinical workflows and outcomes — not just technical severity.
Key insights
What you’ll take away
- Vulnerabilities must be assessed within clinical context, not in isolation.
- Ripple20 and BlueKeep highlight systemic risks in connected care environments.
- CVSS scores alone fail to convey the patient safety implications of device exploits.
- A dual proactive/reactive approach — “shift security left” during design, then monitor continuously — offers the most sustainable defense.
- Collaboration between manufacturers and providers is essential for effective risk management and regulatory compliance.
Who should read this
- Healthcare cybersecurity professionals seeking to align IT risk with patient safety impact
- Regulatory and quality teams integrating clinical risk into vulnerability triage and documentation
- Medical device manufacturers designing secure, resilient connected devices
- Hospital IT and biomedical engineering teams responsible for incident response and device fleet management
Related resources
Go deeper on the topics in this whitepaper with Medcrypt analysis and real device programs.
Blog · Tools & Processes
Case Study: Precision in Practice- How Helm Redefines SBOM Vulnerability Management
Introduction Helm, developed by Medcrypt, emerges as a robust and precise SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) and Vulnerability Management Tool tailored to identify potential…
Read article
Case study · FDA Cybersecurity Readiness
Medcrypt Transforms SBOM Management: 90% Faster Vulnerability Review for Global MDM
From Manual Bottleneck to Automated Intelligence
Read case study